Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Hastie , 29 Ohio St. 3d 28 ( 1987 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    Upon a full review of this matter, this court finds that the respondent has violated DR 1-102(A)(3), (4), (5) and (6), 6-101(A)(3), 7-101(A)(2), and 7-102(A)(3) and (5). This court hereby orders that the respondent be permanently disbarred from the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

    It is further ordered that the costs of these proceedings be taxed to respondent.

    Judgment accordingly.

    Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and H. Brown, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: D.D. No. 86-34

Citation Numbers: 29 Ohio St. 3d 28, 505 N.E.2d 261, 29 Ohio B. 380, 1987 Ohio LEXIS 239

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Filed Date: 3/18/1987

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024