Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Ellison ( 1990 )

Per Curiam.

We agree with the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Respondent is therefore publicly reprimanded for having violated DR 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(3). Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.