Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Crane ( 1990 )

Per Curiam.

We find respondent’s conduct to be a violation of DR 1-102(A)(4) and (5) and concur in the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, without credit for the time already suspended. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.