Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Hanaghan ( 1992 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    We agree with the board’s findings and recommendation. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs taxed to respondent.

    Judgment accordingly.

    Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 92-834

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Filed Date: 9/2/1992

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024