-
Per Curiam. On appeal, appellant argues that the good-cause requirement denies him due process of law because he had no notice of the ninety-day filing requirement. We reject this argument and affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Appellant is not entitled to special notice of changes in the law.
Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Document Info
Docket Number: No. 94-1983
Citation Numbers: 71 Ohio St. 3d 397
Judges: Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Filed Date: 12/30/1994
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 7/21/2022