Mitchell v. Smith ( 2008 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the petition of appellant, Ervin L. Mitchell, for a writ of habeas corpus because a claimed violation of Crim.R. 32(C) does not entitle an inmate to immediate release from prison. Instead, if a violation is established, “the appropriate remedy is resentencing instead of outright release.” McAllister v. Smith, 119 Ohio St.3d 163, 2008-Ohio-3881, 892 N.E.2d 914, ¶ 9.1

    Judgment affirmed.

    Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

    . We deny Mitchell’s motion for oral argument.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 2008-1521

Judges: Connor, Cupp, Donnell, Lanzinger, Moyer, Pfeifer, Stratton

Filed Date: 12/2/2008

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024