State v. Nixon ( 1834 )

BY THE COURT.

The witness has been permitted to go by the party who summoned him, and who applied for the attachment,, because he did go after he gave him leave. He is more in contempt, than the witness.

* Ordered, That the witness be discharged, and that M’llvaine,, the applicant for the writ, pay the costs forthwith, and, if he refuse,, that an attachment issue against him.