State v. Stiltner ( 2022 )

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State
v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.]
NOTICE
This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an
advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to
promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65
South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other
formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before
the opinion is published.
SLIP OPINION NO. 2022-OHIO-3589THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. STILTNER, APPELLANT.
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it
may be cited as State v. Stiltner, Slip Opinion No. 2022-Ohio-3589.]
Court of appeals’ judgment vacated and cause remanded for a new trial consistent
with State v. Brooks.
(No. 2021-0573―Submitted October 4, 2022―Decided October 12, 2022.)
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Scioto County,
No. 19CA3882, 2021-Ohio-959.
_________________
{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated, and the cause is
remanded to the trial court for a new trial consistent with this court’s opinion in
State v. Brooks, __ Ohio St.3d __, 2022-Ohio-2478, __ N.E.3d __.
O’CONNOR, C.J., and KENNEDY, FISCHER, DEWINE, DONNELLY, STEWART,
and BRUNNER, JJ., concur.
_________________
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Shane A. Tieman, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jay S. Willis,
Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
Richard M. Nash Jr., for appellant, Nathan Stiltner.
_________________
2