Ex parte Maltos ( 1960 )


Menu:
  • Per Curiam.

    Petitioner had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction and sentence to review the alleged irregularities or errors of which he here complains and cannot now have such a review by a proceeding in habeas corpus.

    Petitioner remanded to custody.

    W EYGANDT, C. J., ZlMMERMAN, TaFT, MATTHIAS, BeLL, Herbert and Peck, J J., concur.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. 36443

Judges: Bell, Eygandt, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taft, Zlmmerman

Filed Date: 7/13/1960

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/19/2024