State v. Weir , 2022 Ohio 330 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Weir, 
    2022-Ohio-330
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    ASHTABULA COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                    CASE NO. 2021-A-0032
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    Criminal Appeal from the
    -v-                                       Court of Common Pleas
    KEVIN A. WEIR,
    Trial Court No. 2016 CR 00465
    Defendant-Appellant.
    MEMORANDUM
    OPINION
    Decided: February 7, 2022
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed
    Colleen M. O’Toole, Ashtabula County Prosecutor, and Shelley M. Pratt, Assistant
    Prosecutor, 25 West Jefferson Street, Jefferson, OH 44047-1092 (For Plaintiff-
    Appellee).
    Kevin A. Weir, pro se, PID# A691-188, Belmont Correctional Institution, 68518 Bannock
    Road, P.O. Box 540, St. Clairsville, OH 43950 (Defendant-Appellant).
    MATT LYNCH, J.
    {¶1} Appellant, Kevin A. Weir, filed a pro se notice of appeal on October 25, 2021,
    from an October 12, 2021 judgment entry of the Ashtabula County Court of Common
    Pleas denying his motion for judicial release under R.C. 2929.20.
    {¶2}     In State v. Coffman, 
    91 Ohio St.3d 125
    , 126 (2001), the Supreme Court of
    Ohio held that the denial of a motion for shock probation under the former R.C. 2947.061
    is never a final appealable order. The General Assembly replaced shock probation with
    judicial release, effective July 1, 1996.
    {¶3}   Ohio courts have held that the same logic regarding finality applies to the
    denial of a motion for judicial release. The denial of a motion for judicial release cannot
    affect a “substantial right” as that term is defined in R.C. 2505.02(A) because the trial
    court judge has full discretion whether to grant or deny judicial release. It is simply not
    a final appealable order. State v. Cruz, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109770, 
    2021-Ohio-947
    ;
    State v. Zakrajsek, 11th Dist. Ashtabula No. 2018-A-0033, 
    2018-Ohio-1885
    ; State v.
    Williams, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 95359, 
    2011-Ohio-120
    , at ¶ 10-11; State v. Ingram,
    10th Dist. Franklin No. 03AP-149, 
    2003-Ohio-5380
    , ¶ 6-7; State v. Burgess, 2d Dist.
    Greene No. 01-CA-87, 
    2002-Ohio-2594
    .
    {¶4}   Therefore, this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of a final
    appealable order.
    {¶5}   Appeal dismissed.
    THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.,
    JOHN J. EKLUND, J.,
    concur.
    2
    Case No. 2021-A-0032
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2021-A-0032

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 330

Judges: Lynch

Filed Date: 2/7/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/14/2022