State v. Gregory , 2017 Ohio 7210 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Gregory, 2017-Ohio-7210.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    BUTLER COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                      :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                         :       CASE NO. CA2017-02-019
    :              DECISION
    - vs -                                                            8/14/2017
    :
    ROBERT H. GREGORY,                                  :
    Defendant-Appellant.                        :
    CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. CR2016-06-0858
    Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Government Services Center,
    315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-appellee
    Michele Temmel, 6 South Second Street, Suite 305, Hamilton, Ohio 4511, for
    defendant-appellant
    Per Curiam.
    {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the
    transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original
    papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by
    appellant's counsel.
    {¶2}     Counsel for defendant-appellant, Robert Gregory, has filed a brief with this
    court pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    (1967), which (1)
    indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose
    Butler CA2017-02-019
    any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an
    assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably
    support the appeal," Anders, at 
    744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400
    ; (3) requests that this court review
    the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial
    error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests
    permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly
    frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been
    served upon appellant.
    {¶3}   Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response
    having been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error
    prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of
    counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is
    dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.
    S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2017-02-019

Citation Numbers: 2017 Ohio 7210

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 8/14/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 8/14/2017