State ex rel. Mays v. McCormick ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State ex rel. Mays v. McCormick, 2017-Ohio-7891.]
    Court of Appeals of Ohio
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    No. 106009
    STATE OF OHIO, EX REL.
    BRIAN MAYS
    RELATOR
    vs.
    JUDGE TIMOTHY MCCORMICK
    RESPONDENT
    JUDGMENT:
    WRIT DENIED
    Writ of Procedendo
    Motion No. 509330
    Order No. 510188
    RELEASE DATE: September 27, 2017
    FOR RELATOR
    Brian Mays, pro se
    1254 Parkwood Drive
    Cleveland, Ohio 44108
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
    Michael C. O’Malley
    Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
    By: James E. Moss
    Assistant County Prosecutor
    The Justice Center
    1200 Ontario Street
    Cleveland, Ohio 44113
    EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J.:
    {¶1} On July 18, 2017, the relator, Brian Mays, commenced this procedendo
    action against the respondent, Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Judge Timothy
    McCormick, to compel him to rule on a motion to terminate postrelease control that he
    had filed in the underlying case, State v. Mays, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-02-424093-ZA.
    Respondent has moved for summary judgment on the grounds of mootness, which Mays
    has not opposed.
    {¶2} Attached to respondent’s motion is a certified copy of a journal entry,
    file-stamped July 26, 2017, granting defendant’s motion. The journal entry, therefore,
    establishes that the request for a writ of procedendo is moot.      State ex rel. Bortoli v.
    Dinkelacker, 
    105 Ohio St. 3d 133
    , 2005-Ohio-779, 
    823 N.E.2d 448
    , ¶ 3 (“A writ of
    procedendo will not issue to compel the performance of a duty that has already been
    performed.”); State ex rel. Jerningham v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    74 Ohio St. 3d 278
    , 
    658 N.E.2d 723
    (1996); State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of
    Common Pleas, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 98699, 2012-Ohio-5423.
    {¶3}   Accordingly, this court grants the respondent’s motion for summary
    judgment and denies the writ. Costs assessed against relator; costs waived. The clerk
    is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the
    journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
    {¶4} Writ denied.
    EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, JUDGE
    KATHLEEN ANN KEOUGH, A.J., and
    FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J., CONCUR
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 106009

Judges: Gallagher

Filed Date: 9/27/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/28/2017