State v. Payne , 2018 Ohio 220 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Payne, 
    2018-Ohio-220
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    BUTLER COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                   :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                      :        CASE NO. CA2017-06-083
    :               DECISION
    - vs -                                                          1/22/2018
    :
    LEWIS A. PAYNE,                                  :
    Defendant-Appellant.                     :
    CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. CR2017-01-0128
    Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Lina N. Alkamhawi, Government
    Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, OH 45011-6057, for plaintiff-
    appellee
    Mary K. Martin, 4660 Duke Drive, Suite 101, Mason, Ohio 45040, for defendant-appellant
    Per Curiam.
    {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript
    of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the
    Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
    {¶2}     Counsel for defendant-appellant, Lewis Payne, has filed a brief with this court
    pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S.Ct. 1396
     (1967), which (1) indicates
    Butler CA20167-06-083
    that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors
    by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may
    be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders,
    at 744, 
    87 S.Ct. at 1400
    ; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to
    determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement
    of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for
    appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both
    the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
    {¶3}    Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason
    that it is wholly frivolous.
    S. POWELL, P.J., RINGLAND and HENDRICKSON, JJ., concur.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2017-06-083

Citation Numbers: 2018 Ohio 220

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 1/22/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/22/2018