Travis v. Trumbull Cty. Sheriff , 2017 Ohio 8948 ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Travis v. Trumbull Cty. Sheriff, 
    2017-Ohio-8948
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    TRUMBULL COUNTY, OHIO
    HAROLD TRAVIS,                                           :   PER CURIAM OPINION
    Petitioner,                             :
    CASE NO. 2017-T-0085
    - vs -                                           :
    TRUMBULL COUNTY SHERIFF,                                 :
    Respondent.                             :
    Original Action for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
    Judgment: Petition dismissed.
    Harold Travis, pro se, Trumbull County Jail, 150 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH,
    44481 (Petitioner).
    Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor,
    160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH, 44481 (For Respondent).
    PER CURIAM.
    {¶1}     Petitioner, Harold Travis, petitions this court to grant a writ of habeas
    corpus, directed to respondent, Paul Monroe, Sheriff of Trumbull County. Respondent
    has neither answered, nor moved to dismiss. We dismiss the petition, sua sponte.
    {¶2}     Evidently Mr. Travis is being held in Trumbull Case No. 2015 CR 00161.
    We can take judicial notice of the trial court’s docket. In that case, the Trumbull County
    Grand Jury returned an indictment against Mr. Travis August 5, 2015, charging him with
    felonious assault, two counts of kidnapping, extortion, and having weapons under
    disability. Bond was set at $100,000, along with electronically monitored house arrest.
    On or about March 13, 2017, the state moved to revoke Mr. Travis’ bond, and for a
    warrant to issue for his arrest. The trial court granted the motion that day, and a warrant
    issued for Mr. Travis arrest on or about March 14 or 15, 2017.
    {¶3}   Mr. Travis also petitions this court to grant a writ of habeas corpus,
    directed to respondent, Paul Monroe, Sheriff of Trumbull County, in case number 2017-
    T-0084 which concerns Trumbull Case No. 2016 CR 00580. We will deal with that
    petition in a separate opinion.
    {¶4}   In his petition, Mr. Travis alleges his religious rights are being violated due
    to his present incarceration. He further alleges that he should be granted bail, and/or
    that the bail required is excessive.
    {¶5}   In State ex rel. Reeves v. Sloan, 11th Dist. Ashtabula No. 2016-A-0038,
    
    2017-Ohio-619
    , ¶8, we stated:
    {¶6}   “‘Habeas corpus is an available remedy only in “certain extraordinary
    circumstances where there is an unlawful restraint of a person’s liberty, notwithstanding
    the fact that only nonjurisdictional issues are involved, but only where there is no
    adequate legal remedy, e.g., appeal or postconviction relief.” State ex rel. Jackson v.
    McFaul, 
    73 Ohio St.3d 185
    , 186 * * * (1995), citing State ex rel. Pirman v. Money, 
    69 Ohio St.3d 591
    , 593 * * * (1994). “Additionally, habeas corpus lies only if the petitioner
    is entitled to immediate release from confinement.” Jackson at 188, citing Pewitt v.
    Lorain Corr. Inst, 
    64 Ohio St.3d 470
    , 472 * * * (1992); R.C. 2725.17.’ (Parallel citations
    omitted.) State ex rel. Williams v. Goodrich, 11th Dist. Ashtabula No. 2012–A–0060,
    2013–Ohio–3474, ¶ 16.”
    2
    {¶7}   In order to be entitled to habeas relief, the petitioner must state with
    particularity the extraordinary circumstances entitling him or her to relief. McBroom v.
    Russell, 
    77 Ohio St.3d 47
    , 48 (1996). Mr. Travis has failed to do so. He does not
    explain how his incarceration violates his religious beliefs. He was granted bond, which
    was then revoked. He does not tell us why, or why such revocation is unfair.
    {¶8}   Further, a petition for habeas corpus must conform to the requirements of
    R.C. 2725.05 to avoid dismissal.        The instant petition does not.      R.C. 2725.04(D)
    requires the petitioner to attach a copy of the commitment papers. Mr. Travis did not.
    Failure to do so mandates dismissal. State ex. rel. Arroyo, 
    142 Ohio St.3d 541
    , 2015-
    Ohio-2081, ¶3.
    {¶9}   Further, a petitioner for habeas relief must also comply with the
    requirements of R.C. 2969.25.        See, e.g., Arroyo, supra, at ¶4.       R.C. 2969.25(A)
    requires that the petitioner attach an affidavit detailing each civil action he or she has
    filed in state or federal court for the previous five years. Mr. Travis did not.
    {¶10} The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed.
    CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, P.J., DIANE V. GRENDELL, J., COLLEEN MARY
    O’TOOLE, J.,
    concur.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2017-T-0085

Citation Numbers: 2017 Ohio 8948

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 12/11/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/11/2017