Tennant v. State Farm Mutual Insurance ( 1991 )

Since I believe that the plain and unequivocal language ofWood v. Shepard (1988), 38 Ohio St. 3d 86, 526 N.E.2d 1089, mandates the overruling of Assignment of Errors Nos. I and III, I do not agree with the majority's disposition of those assignments.

However, I would sustain Assignment of Error No. II, because there is only one insured beneficiary and State Farm has already paid the limit therefor established in the policy.

Accordingly, I concur in the judgment of reversal.