State ex rel. Thomas v. Strickland-Saffold ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State ex rel. Thomas v. Strickland-Saffold, 
    2014-Ohio-5347
    .]
    Court of Appeals of Ohio
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    No. 101932
    STATE OF OHIO, EX REL.
    DAROLD THOMAS
    RELATOR
    vs.
    HONORABLE SHIRLEY
    STRICKLAND-SAFFOLD
    RESPONDENT
    JUDGMENT:
    WRIT DENIED
    Writ of Mandamus
    Motion No. 480122
    Order No. 480151
    RELEASE DATE: December 3, 2014
    FOR RELATOR
    Darold Thomas, pro se
    Inmate No. 644
    Trumbull Correctional Camp
    P.O. Box 640
    Leavittsburg, Ohio 44430
    ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
    Timothy J. McGinty
    Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
    By: James E. Moss
    Assistant County Prosecutor
    9th Floor Justice Center
    1200 Ontario Street
    Cleveland, Ohio 44113
    EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, J.:
    {¶1} Darold Thomas has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus.            Thomas seeks an
    order from this court that requires Judge Shirley Strickland Saffold to render a ruling with regard
    to a motion for jail-time credit filed in State v. Thomas, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-12-561685.
    Judge Saffold has filed a motion for summary judgment that we grant for the following reasons.
    {¶2} Attached to Judge Saffold’s motion for summary judgment is a copy of a judgment
    entry, journalized on November 10, 2014, which demonstrates that a ruling has been rendered
    with regard to Thomas’s motion for jail-time credit.          Thus, the complaint for a writ of
    mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    74 Ohio St.3d 278
    , 
    658 N.E.2d 723
     (1996); State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 
    6 Ohio St.3d 5
    , 
    450 N.E.2d 1163
     (1983).
    {¶3} In addition, Thomas’s complaint for a writ of mandamus is defective. Thomas’s
    complaint failed to comply with Loc.App.R. 45(B)(1)(a), which requires that his complaint
    contain a sworn affidavit that specifies the details of his claim.         State ex rel. Hopson v.
    Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    135 Ohio St.3d 456
    , 
    2013-Ohio-1911
    , 
    989 N.E.2d 49
    ;
    State ex rel. Leon v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    123 Ohio St.3d 124
    ,
    
    2009-Ohio-4688
    , 
    914 N.E.2d 402
    . Thomas has also failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A),
    which mandates that he provide this court with a sworn affidavit that contains a description of
    each civil action or appeal of a civil action filed in the previous five years in any state or federal
    court. State ex rel. McGrath v. McDonnell, 
    126 Ohio St.3d 511
    , 
    2010-Ohio-4726
    , 
    935 N.E.2d 830
    . Finally, Thomas has failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C)(1), which mandates that he
    file a statement setting forth his inmate account “for each of the preceding six months, as
    certified by the institutional cashier.” State ex rel. Castro v. Corrigan, 
    129 Ohio St.3d 342
    ,
    
    2011-Ohio-4059
    , 
    952 N.E.2d 497
    .
    {¶4} Accordingly, we grant Judge Saffold’s motion for summary judgment.           Costs to
    Judge Saffold. Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with
    notice of this judgment and the date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
    {¶5} Writ denied.
    EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, JUDGE
    MARY J. BOYLE, A.J., and
    MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., CONCUR