State ex rel. Keith v. Russo ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State ex rel. Keith v. Russo, 
    2014-Ohio-5346
    .]
    Court of Appeals of Ohio
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    No. 101901
    STATE OF OHIO, EX REL.
    JEFFREY C. KEITH
    RELATOR
    vs.
    JUDGE JOSEPH D. RUSSO
    RESPONDENT
    JUDGMENT:
    WRIT DENIED
    Writ of Mandamus
    Motion No. 479123
    Order No. 479813
    RELEASED DATE:                 December 2, 2014
    -i-
    FOR RELATOR
    Jeffrey C. Keith, pro se
    Inmate #334-054
    Marion Correctional Institution
    P.O. Box 57
    Marion, Ohio 43301
    ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT
    Timothy J. McGinty
    Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
    9th Floor Justice Center
    1200 Ontario Street
    Cleveland, Ohio 44113
    PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J.:
    {¶1}    Jeffrey Keith has filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Keith seeks an order
    from this court that requires Judge Joseph D. Russo to grant motions to vacate void judgments
    that were filed on the following cases: State v. Keith, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-94-316724-ZA;
    State v. Keith, Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-96-333972-ZA; and State v. Keith, Cuyahoga C.P. No.
    CR-97-350831-ZA.
    {¶2}    Attached to Judge Russo’s motion for summary judgment are copies of judgment
    entries in each case that were journalized on October 8, 2014. Respondent has demonstrated that
    rulings have been rendered with regard to each motion. Keith is not entitled to a writ of
    mandamus because it is moot. State ex rel. Culgan v. Kimbler, 
    132 Ohio St.3d 480
    ,
    
    2012-Ohio-3310
    , 
    974 N.E.2d 88
     (a writ of mandamus will not be issued to compel an act already
    performed); see also State ex rel. Pettway v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 8th Dist.
    Cuyahoga No. 99259, 
    2013-Ohio-1567
    , ¶ 2. Although Keith sought a writ of mandamus that
    would compel respondent to grant the motions, he is not entitled to this relief. Mandamus will not
    be issued to compel respondent judge to enter a specific judgment on a motion. State ex rel. Avery
    v. Union Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    125 Ohio St.3d 35
    , 
    2010-Ohio-1427
    , 
    925 N.E.2d 969
    .
    {¶3}    Judge Russo’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Costs to respondent.
    Costs waived. The court directs the clerk of courts to serve all parties with notice of this judgment
    and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B).
    {¶4}    Writ denied.
    PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, JUDGE
    MARY EILEEN KILBANE, P.J., and
    MELODY J. STEWART, J., CONCUR