Discover Bank v. Ojnik ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Discover Bank v. Ojnik, 2014-Ohio-5382.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
    DISCOVER BANK,                                      :      MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                :
    CASE NO. 2014-L-103
    - vs -                                      :
    MARY ANN OJNIK,                                     :
    Defendant-Appellant.               :
    Civil Appeal from the Painesville Municipal Court, Case No. CVF 1301550
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed.
    Woo Song Jun and Matthew G. Burg, Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., L.P.A., 323 West
    Lakeside Avenue, Suite 200, Cleveland, OH 44113 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
    David M. Lynch, 333 Babbit Road, Suite 333, Euclid, OH               44123 (For Defendant-
    Appellant).
    DIANE V. GRENDELL, J.
    {¶1}     On October 10, 2014, appellant, Mary Ann Ojnik, by and through counsel
    of record, David M. Lynch, filed a notice of appeal from a September 9, 2014 entry of
    the Painesville Municipal Court.
    {¶2}     On October 22, 2014, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the
    grounds that the notice of appeal was untimely filed pursuant to App.R. 4(A). Appellant
    has filed no response in opposition to the motion to dismiss.
    {¶3}     App.R. 3(A) expressly states that the only jurisdictional requirement for the
    filing of a valid appeal is to file a notice of appeal within the time allowed by App.R. 4.
    The Supreme Court of Ohio has held that the failure to comply with the time
    requirements of App.R. 4(A) is a jurisdictional defect, which is fatal to an appeal. In re
    H.F., 
    120 Ohio St. 3d 499
    , 2008-Ohio-6810, ¶ 17, citing State ex rel. Pendell v. Adams
    Cty. Bd. of Elections, 
    40 Ohio St. 3d 58
    , 60 (1988).
    {¶4}   App.R. 4(A)(1) and (3) require a party to file a notice of appeal “within 30
    days” of an entry that is final or, “if the clerk has not completed service of the order
    [entry] within the three-day period prescribed by Civ.R. 58(B), * * * the date when the
    clerk actually completes service.”
    {¶5}   Civ.R. 58(B) directs the clerk of courts to serve the parties with notice of
    the judgment within three days of entering the judgment upon the journal.
    {¶6}   The record in this case clearly shows that the order from which appellant
    wishes to appeal was entered on the court’s docket and filed on September 9, 2014.
    On September 11, 2014, the clerk of courts noted on the appearance docket that a
    “copy of judgment entry [was] mailed to Woo S. Jun & David Lynch.”
    {¶7}   Thus, service was made on appellant within the three day period required
    in Civ.R. 58(B), and the thirty day time period began to run on the date of entry of
    judgment, September 9, 2014. Accordingly, the deadline for appellant to file her notice
    of appeal was October 9, 2014, which was not a holiday or a weekend. This court is not
    empowered to extend the time deadline in civil cases. 
    Pendell, supra, at 60
    ; see also
    App.R. 14(B). Appellant untimely filed her notice of appeal on October 10, 2014.
    {¶8}   Based upon the foregoing, appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is
    hereby granted, and this is appeal is dismissed pursuant to App.R. 4(A).
    TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J.,
    THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.,
    concur.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2014-L-103

Judges: Grendell

Filed Date: 12/8/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/8/2014