State v. Sullivan , 2019 Ohio 4413 ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Sullivan, 2019-Ohio-4413.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
    STATE OF OHIO,                                     :        MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
    CASE NOS. 2019-L-004
    - vs -                                    :                  2019-L-005
    KEVIN F. SULLIVAN,                                 :
    Defendant-Appellant.            :
    Criminal Appeals from the Willoughby Municipal Court, Case Nos. 2018 CRB 00355 B
    and 2018 CRB 01014.
    Judgment: Appeals dismissed.
    Judson J. Hawkins, City of Eastlake Prosecutor, 37811 Lake Shore Boulevard, Eastlake,
    Ohio 44095 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
    Cory R. Hinton, Hanahan & Hinton, LLC, 8570 Mentor Avenue, Mentor, Ohio 44060 (For
    Defendant-Appellant).
    THOMAS R. WRIGHT, P.J.
    {¶1}       Appellant was charged with domestic violence, R.C. 2919.25(A), and
    assault, R.C. 2903.13(A), in case number 18 CBR 00366. He was charged with violating
    a protection order, R.C. 2919.27(A)(1), in case number 18 CRB 01014.
    {¶2}       The cases were consolidated for trial only. The jury found appellant guilty
    of assault and violating a protection order but not guilty of domestic violence. On August
    24, 2018, separate judgments were issued finding appellant guilty of assault and violating
    a protection order. On September 18, 2018, separate sentencing judgments were issued.
    The sentencing judgments do not restate the fact of conviction. Appellant separately
    appealed the sentencing judgments which were consolidated for appeal.
    {¶3}   “A judgment of conviction shall set forth the fact of conviction and the
    sentence.” Crim.R. 32(C). A final appealable order does not exist unless the fact of
    conviction and the sentence are stated in a single judgment. State v. Lusane, 11th Dist.
    Portage No. 2019-P-00027, 2019-Ohio-3549, ¶ 5, citing State v. Lester, 
    130 Ohio St. 3d 303
    ; 2011-Ohio-5204, 
    958 N.E.2d 142
    , at paragraph one of the syllabus; State v.
    Rexrode, 2017-Ohio-8837, 
    100 N.E.3d 1089
    , ¶ 12 (10th Dist.).
    {¶4}   Because the sentencing judgments do not restate the fact of conviction, the
    appeals are dismissed for lack of final appealable orders.
    CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,
    MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,
    concur.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2019-L-004 & 2019-L-005

Citation Numbers: 2019 Ohio 4413

Judges: Wright

Filed Date: 10/28/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/28/2019