State v. Ocasio , 2017 Ohio 88 ( 2017 )

[Cite as State v. Ocasio, 2017-Ohio-88.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio
EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
No. 103972
STATE OF OHIO
PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
vs.
UBALDO OCASIO
DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
JUDGMENT:
DISMISSED
Criminal Appeal from the
Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
Case No. CR-15-598912-A
BEFORE: McCormack, J., E.A. Gallagher, P.J., and E.T. Gallagher, J.
RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: January 12, 2017
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
Allison S. Breneman
1220 West 6th Street
Suite 303
Cleveland, OH 44113
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
Michael C. O’Malley
Cuyahoga County Prosecutor
By: John Patrick Colan
Assistant County Prosecutor
Justice Center, 8th Floor
1200 Ontario Street
Cleveland, OH 44113
TIM McCORMACK, J.:
{¶1} Defendant-appellant Ubaldo Ocasio appeals from his conviction for one
count of rape, two counts of sexual battery, and several counts of gross sexual imposition,
kidnapping, and endangering children. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss for lack
of a final, appealable order.
{¶2} On September 4, 2015, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury charged Ocasio in
a 30-count indictment that included charges of rape; kidnapping, with sexual motivation
specification; gross sexual imposition; sexual battery; and endangering children. The
charges also included a sexually violent predator specification.
{¶3} The matter proceeded to a jury trial, and on December 10, 2015, the jury
found Ocasio guilty on the following counts: Counts 1-12, 14, 24, and 27-30. The jury
found Ocasio not guilty on Counts 13, 15-23, 25, and 26. The jury further found Ocasio
to be a sexually violent predator on all eligible charges as outlined in the specifications.
{¶4} Prior to imposing sentence, the court heard from the parties regarding
merger. The parties agreed that Counts 9 (rape) and 10 (sexual battery) merged, and the
state elected to proceed with sentencing on Count 9. The court determined, however,
that the remaining kidnapping, gross sexual imposition, and sexual battery offenses do not
merge. There was no discussion regarding the endangering children counts.
{¶5} The court imposed a prison sentence as follows: Counts 1, 3, 5, and 7,
GSI with sexually violent predator specification — 5 years to life on each count; Counts
2, 4, 6, 8, 11, kidnapping with sexually violent predator specification — 15 years to life
on each count; Count 9, rape with sexually violent predator specification — 25 years to
life; Counts 12 and 14, GSI with sexually violent predator specification — 18 months to
life on each count; and Count 24, sexual battery with sexually violent predator
specification — 5 years to life. The court ordered the terms to be served consecutively
for an aggregate sentence of 128 years imprisonment. The court did not impose a
sentence on Counts 27 – 30, endangering children.
{¶6} Ocasio filed a timely notice of appeal, raising eight assignments of error.
This court, however, cannot consider the merits of his appeal because we are without
jurisdiction to do so.
{¶7} Under Crim.R. 32(C), “‘[a] judgment of conviction shall set forth the plea,
the verdict or findings, and the sentence.’” State v. Jones, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No.
102314, 2015-Ohio-2409, ¶ 6, quoting State v. Hicks, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 84418,
2004-Ohio-6113, ¶ 6. The duty under Crim.R. 32(C) to set forth a verdict and sentence
for each offense is “mandatory.” Therefore, “an order that ‘fails to impose sentence for
an offense for which the offender was found guilty not only violates this rule, but renders
the resultant order non-final and not immediately appealable.’” Id.; see also State v.
Kelley, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 97389, 2012-Ohio-2309, ¶ 5. “Absent the imposition of
sentence on each and every offense for which [a defendant] was convicted, there is no
final, appealable order.” State v. Collins, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 79064, 2001 Ohio
App. LEXIS 4666, 3 (Oct. 18, 2001).
{¶8} Here, the transcript from the sentencing and the trial court’s sentencing
entry are silent with respect to Counts 27 – 30, endangering children. Therefore,
because the court failed to impose a sentence on each and every offense for which Ocasio
was found guilty, the judgment of conviction is not final and appealable. Accordingly,
we have no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
{¶9} Appeal dismissed.
It is ordered that appellee recover of appellant costs herein taxed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of
the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
_________________________________________
TIM McCORMACK, JUDGE
EILEEN A. GALLAGHER, P.J., and
EILEEN T. GALLAGHER, J., CONCUR