State v. Rigsby , 2017 Ohio 329 ( 2017 )

[Cite as State v. Rigsby, 2017-Ohio-329.]
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
BUTLER COUNTY
STATE OF OHIO, :
CASE NO. CA2016-06-121
Plaintiff-Appellee, :
OPINION
: 1/30/2017
- vs –
:
JESSICA RIGSBY, :
Defendant-Appellant. :
CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Case No. CR2016-02-0160
Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, Lina N. Alkamhawi, Government
Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee
Scott N. Blauvelt, 315 S. Monument, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for defendant-appellant
S. POWELL, P.J.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jessica Rigsby, appeals from the sentence she received
in the Butler County Court of Common Pleas after she pled guilty to trafficking in heroin. For
the reasons outlined below, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
{¶ 2} On March 23, 2016, the Butler County Grand Jury returned an indictment
charging Rigsby with two counts of trafficking in heroin in violation of R.C. 2925.03(A)(1),
both fifth-degree felonies. After entering into a plea agreement, on May 5, 2016, Rigsby pled
Butler CA2016-06-121
guilty to one count of trafficking in heroin in exchange for the other count being dismissed by
the state.
{¶ 3} On June 16, 2016, the trial court held a sentencing hearing and sentenced
Rigsby to one year in prison and suspended her driver's license for a period of six months.
The trial court also advised Rigsby that she would be subject to an optional three-year term
of postrelease control. Although explicitly stating Rigsby was not subject to any fines, the trial
court was silent as to whether court costs would be imposed.
{¶ 4} On June 21, 2016, the trial court issued its judgment entry of conviction and,
within its entry, ordered Rigsby to pay court costs. Rigsby now appeals, raising one
assignment of error arguing the trial court erred by imposing court costs in its sentencing
entry when it failed to notify her that it was imposing costs during her sentencing hearing.
The state concedes, and we agree, that the trial court failed to inform Rigsby at her
sentencing hearing that it was imposing court costs.
{¶ 5} In State v. Joseph, 125 Ohio St. 3d 76, 2010-Ohio-954, the Ohio Supreme Court
held that a trial court errs by imposing court costs in its sentencing entry when it failed to
impose those costs in open court at the defendant's sentencing hearing. Id. at ¶ 22. When
such an error occurs, the remedy is to remand for the limited purpose to allow the defendant
to move the trial court for a waiver of payment of court costs. Id. at ¶ 22-23.
{¶ 6} Upon review of the transcript, it is clear that the trial court did not impose court
costs during the sentence hearing. As a result, as the Ohio Supreme Court stated in Joseph,
Rigsby suffered harm in that she was denied the opportunity to claim indigency and seek a
waiver of those costs before the trial court. Id; see, e.g., State v. Howard, 12th Dist. Butler
No. CA2014-04-091, ¶ 9; State v. Simmonds, 12th Dist. Clermont No. CA2011-05-038, 2012-
Ohio-1479, ¶ 37. Therefore, Rigsby's single assignment of error is sustained and her
sentence is reversed and remanded for the limited purpose of imposing court costs in
-2-
Butler CA2016-06-121
accordance with the Ohio Supreme Court's holding in Joseph.
{¶ 7} Judgment reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
RINGLAND and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
-3-