State v. Thompson , 2018 Ohio 4177 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Thompson, 2018-Ohio-4177.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    PORTAGE COUNTY, OHIO
    STATE OF OHIO,                                  :        MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
    CASE NO. 2018-P-0066
    - vs -                                       :
    MICHAEL THOMPSON,                               :
    Defendant-Appellant.            :
    Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2018 CR 00075.
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed.
    Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna,
    OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
    Michael Thompson, pro se, Portage County Jail, 8240 Infirmary Road, Ravenna, OH
    44266 (Defendant-Appellant).
    DIANE V. GRENDELL, J.
    {¶1}    Appellant, Michael Thompson, filed a pro se appeal from the trial court’s
    August 23, 2018 judgment entry. At the end of the entry, the court stated the following:
    {¶2}    “* * * [T]he Court finds that the jury returned a verdict of ‘GUILTY’ to the
    charge contained in Count One of the Indictment, said charge being ‘Possession of
    Cocaine”, a felony of the fifth degree, in violation of R.C. 2925.11 AC4a.’
    {¶3}   “IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Defendant shall remain in custody and
    this matter is referred to Portage County Adult Probation for an expedited Statutory
    Investigation and Report.”
    {¶4}   R.C. 2505.02(B) defines the types of orders that constitute a final
    appealable order:
    {¶5}   “(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect
    determines the action and prevents a judgment;
    {¶6}   “(2) An order that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding
    or upon a summary application in an action after judgment;
    {¶7}   “(3) An order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial;
    {¶8}   “(4) An order that or denies a provisional remedy and to which both of the
    following apply:
    {¶9}   “(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the
    provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party
    with respect to the provisional remedy.
    {¶10} “(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective
    remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and
    parties in the action.
    {¶11} “(5) An order that determines that an action may or may not be maintained
    as a class action;
    {¶12} * * *.”
    {¶13} In criminal cases, pursuant to R.C. 2953.02, a court of appeals only
    possesses jurisdiction to hear an appeal if it is from a “judgment or final order.”
    2
    Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Ohio has stated that “in a criminal case there must
    be a sentence which constitutes a judgment or a final order which amounts ‘to a
    disposition of the cause’ before there is a basis for appeal.” State v. Chamberlain, 
    177 Ohio St. 104
    , 106-107 (1964).
    {¶14} Here, there has been no disposition of the underlying case. The court has
    not made a finding on the verdict, and there is no sentence. The matter was merely
    referred to the probation department for a Statutory Investigation and Report. Pursuant
    to Crim.R. 32(C), a criminal judgment must contain the fact of conviction and the court’s
    sentence. The appeal is premature as neither of the foregoing have been accomplished
    yet.
    {¶15} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby dismissed, sua sponte, for lack of
    jurisdiction.
    CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J.,
    COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J.,
    concur.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2018-P-0066

Citation Numbers: 2018 Ohio 4177

Judges: Grendell

Filed Date: 10/15/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/15/2018