-
[Cite as Brown v. Miller,
2015-Ohio-3953.] STATE OF OHIO, BELMONT COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. ) JESTON BROWN, ) ) PETITIONER, ) ) CASE NO. 15 BE 37 V. ) ) OPINION MICHELE MILLER, WARDEN, ) AND BELMONT CORRECTIONAL ) JUDGMENT ENTRY INSTITUTION, ) ) RESPONDENT. ) CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus JUDGMENT: Dismissed APPEARANCES: For Petitioner Jeston Brown, Pro-se Belmont Correctional Institution A-642259 P.O. Box 540 St. Clairsville, Ohio 43950-0540 For Respondent M. Scott Criss Assistant Attorney General Criminal Justice Section 150 East Gay Street, 16th Floor Columbus, Ohio 43215-6001 JUDGES: Hon. Gene Donofrio Hon. Mary DeGenaro Hon. Carol Ann Robb Dated: September 25, 2015 -2- PER CURIAM. {¶1} Petitioner Jeston Brown has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus seeking his immediate release from Belmont Correctional Institution in Belmont County, Ohio. Attached to the petition is a copy of the Wayne County Common Pleas Court sentencing order in case number 13-CR-0027. Petitioner argues that the trial court, as a common pleas court, lacked jurisdiction because it does not have jurisdiction over felonies. Respondent Michelle Miller has filed a motion to dismiss. {¶2} Petitioner plead guilty to two counts of rape in Wayne County Common Pleas Court, one in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) and the other in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2), each first-degree felonies. The trial court sentenced him to 3- and 9-year consecutive terms of incarceration, respectively, for an aggregate term of 12 years in prison. {¶3} The general law of habeas corpus is that a petitioner is only entitled to relief if he can show he has no adequate remedy at law. Agee v. Russell,
92 Ohio St.3d 540, 544,
751 N.E.2d 1043(2001). Clearly, the argument Petitioner is asserting could have been raised in a direct appeal. This would mean that he is not entitled to habeas relief. {¶4} That said, there is a narrow exception to the adequate-remedy-at-law element required for habeas relief: the situation in which the trial court patently and unambiguously lacked jurisdiction. Smith v. Bradshaw,
109 Ohio St.3d 50, 2006- Ohio-1829,
845 N.E.2d 516, ¶ 10; State ex rel. Steele v. Robinson, 4th Dist. No. 12CA3359,
2013-Ohio-3541. Thus, even if Petitioner could have raised the errors on appeal, hey may nevertheless raise the claims by a petition for habeas corpus. {¶5} Petitioner’s arguments that the Wayne County Common Pleas Court patently and unambiguously lacked jurisdiction fail because the common pleas court does have jurisdiction over felonies. R.C. 2931.03 states, “The court of common pleas has original jurisdiction of all crimes and offenses, except in cases of minor offenses the exclusive jurisdiction of which is vested in courts inferior to the court of common pleas.” The Ohio Supreme Court has explained, “The Court of Common Pleas is, by Section 2931.03, Revised Code, given original jurisdiction in felony -3- cases. The felony jurisdiction is invoked by the return of a proper indictment by the grand jury of the county.” Click v. Eckle,
174 Ohio St. 88, 89,
186 N.E.2d 731(1962); see also State ex rel. Pruitt v. Donnelly,
129 Ohio St.3d 498,
2011-Ohio-4203,
954 N.E.2d 117, ¶ 2 (felony case asking for conviction and sentence to be vacated, Ohio Supreme Court stated pursuant to R.C. 2931.03 common pleas court has jurisdiction over criminal proceedings); Jimison v. Wilson,
106 Ohio St.3d 342,
2005-Ohio-5143,
835 N.E.2d 34, ¶ 11 (citing the Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 4 for the position that the common pleas courts have general subject-matter jurisdiction over crimes and offenses committed by adults). {¶6} Consequently, Respondent’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted. It is the judgment and order of this court that Petitioner’s habeas corpus claim is hereby dismissed in its entirety. {¶7} Costs taxed against Petitioner. Final order. Clerk to serve notice on the parties as required by the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure. Donofrio, P.J. concurs. DeGenaro, J. concurs. Robb, J. concurs.
Document Info
Docket Number: 15-BE-37
Citation Numbers: 2015 Ohio 3953
Judges: Per Curiam
Filed Date: 9/25/2015
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 9/29/2015