State v. Biles ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Biles, 2011-Ohio-6477.]
    COURT OF APPEALS
    TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    :   JUDGES:
    STATE OF OHIO                                  :   William B. Hoffman, P.J.
    :   Sheila G. Farmer, J.
    Plaintiff-Appellee   :   Julie A. Edwards, J.
    :
    -vs-                                           :   Case No. 11AP030012
    :
    :
    LARRY BILES                                    :   OPINION
    Defendant-Appellant
    CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING:                            Criminal Appeal from Tuscarawas
    County Court of Common Pleas Case
    No. 2010CR01007
    JUDGMENT:                                           Affirmed
    DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY:                             December 12, 2011
    APPEARANCES:
    For Plaintiff-Appellee                              For Defendant-Appellant
    MICHAEL ERNEST                                      DAN GUINN
    125 EAST HIGH AVENUE                                118 WEST HIGH AVENUE
    NEW PHILADELPHIA, OHIO 44663                        NEW PHILADELPHIA, OHIO 44663
    [Cite as State v. Biles, 2011-Ohio-6477.]
    Edwards, J.
    {¶1}     Appellant, Larry Biles, appeals a judgment of the Tuscarawas County
    Common Pleas Court convicting him of two counts of trafficking in cocaine (R.C.
    2925.03(A)(1)). Appellee is the State of Ohio.
    STATEMENT OF FACTS AND CASE
    {¶2}     On January 13, 2010, appellant was indicted by the Tuscarawas County
    Grand Jury with two counts of trafficking in cocaine. The case proceeded to jury trial in
    the Tuscarawas County Common Pleas Court. Appellant was convicted of both counts.
    The trial court sentenced him to three years of community control. He assigns a single
    error on appeal:
    {¶3}     “APPELLANT’S               CONVICTION   UNDER   OHIO     REVISED       CODE
    2925.03(A)(1) WAS AGAINST THE MANIFEST WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF THE
    EVIDENCE.”
    {¶4}     Appellant's assignment of error relies for its validity on a transcript of the
    proceedings. However, no transcript of the proceedings has been filed in the instant
    case.
    {¶5}     On March 15, 2011, appellant filed a request for a transcript of the
    proceedings. The trial court granted an extension of 40 days within which to file the
    transcript on April 25, 2011. On June 6, 2011, appellant filed a motion for extension of
    time in which to file the transcript with this Court. This Court overruled the motion on
    June 10, 2011, for failure to comply with Loc. R. 8(B). The clerk of courts notified
    appellant that the record was transmitted on June 10, 2011, with no transcripts filed.
    Tuscarawas County App. Case No. 11AP030012                                                3
    {¶6}   Appellant filed a motion to supplement the record with the trial transcript
    on July 20, 2011, noting that the transcript was still being prepared by the court reporter.
    This Court overruled the motion on July 28, 2011, again for failure to comply with Loc.
    R. 8(B).
    {¶7}   The record before us therefore does not include a transcript of the
    proceedings. Absent a transcript, we must presume regularity in the proceedings in the
    trial court. Knapp v. Edwards Laboratory (1980), 
    61 Ohio St. 2d 197
    , 
    400 N.E.2d 384
    .
    {¶8}   Appellant’s assignment of error is overruled.
    {¶9}   The judgment of the Tuscarawas County Common Pleas Court is
    affirmed.
    By: Edwards, J.
    Hoffman, P.J. and
    Farmer, J. concur
    ______________________________
    ______________________________
    ______________________________
    JUDGES
    JAE/1118
    [Cite as State v. Biles, 2011-Ohio-6477.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR TUSCARAWAS COUNTY, OHIO
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    STATE OF OHIO                                     :
    :
    Plaintiff-Appellee   :
    :
    :
    -vs-                                              :       JUDGMENT ENTRY
    :
    LARRY BILES                                       :
    :
    Defendant-Appellant      :       CASE NO. 11AP030012
    For the reasons stated in our accompanying Memorandum-Opinion on file, the
    judgment of the Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.               Costs
    assessed to appellant.
    _________________________________
    _________________________________
    _________________________________
    JUDGES
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 11AP030012

Judges: Edwards

Filed Date: 12/12/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014