Bank of America, N.A. v. Miller , 194 Ohio App. 3d 307 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • Hall, Judge,

    concurring.

    {¶ 60} I concur in judgment because the imprecise documentation provided by the plaintiff, coupled with that part of defendant’s affidavit that is admissible, raises a genuine issue of fact on the singular issue whether plaintiff is the current holder of the note. Although the assignments of error are interrelated, I don’t *319believe that the defendants have satisfied their reciprocal burden to provide admissible evidence with regard to other issues.

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-CA-60

Citation Numbers: 2011 Ohio 1403, 194 Ohio App. 3d 307

Judges: Fain, Grady, Hall

Filed Date: 3/25/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/12/2024