State v. Bonner ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Bonner, 2014-Ohio-3870.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO
    STATE OF OHIO,                                  :         MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                    :
    CASE NO. 2014-G-3202
    - vs -                                       :
    SHERRY L. BONNER,                               :
    Defendant-Appellant.                   :
    Criminal Appeal from the Chardon Municipal Court, Case No. 2014 CR A 00132.
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed.
    James M. Gillette, Chardon Village Law Director, PNC Bank Building, 117 South
    Street, #208, Chardon, OH 44024 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
    Sherry L. Bonner, pro se, 11293 Chardon Road, Chardon, OH 44024 (Defendant-
    Appellant).
    THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J.
    {¶1}    On April 22, 2014, appellant, Sherry L. Bonner, pro se, filed a notice of
    appeal from a March 27, 2014 judgment entry of the Chardon Municipal Court. In that
    judgment entry, the trial court denied appellant’s “Affidavit of Disqualification of Stupica.”
    {¶2}    R.C. 2505.02 defines the types of orders that constitute a final appealable
    order:
    {¶3}    “(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect
    determines the action and prevents a judgment;
    {¶4}    “(2) An order that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding
    or upon a summary application in an action after judgment;
    {¶5}    “(3) An order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial;
    {¶6}    “(4) An order that or denies a provisional remedy and to which both of the
    following apply:
    {¶7}    “(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the
    provisional remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party
    with respect to the provisional remedy.
    {¶8}    “(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective
    remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and
    parties in the action.
    {¶9}    “(5) An order that determines that an action may or may not be maintained
    as a class action; * * *.”
    {¶10} In regard to criminal cases, pursuant to R.C. 2953.02, a court of appeals
    only possesses jurisdiction to hear an appeal if it is from a “judgment or final order.”
    Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Ohio has stated that “in a criminal case there must
    be a sentence which constitutes a judgment or a final order which amounts ‘to a
    disposition of the cause’ before there is a basis for appeal.” State v. Chamberlain, 
    177 Ohio St. 104
    , 106-107(1964).
    {¶11} An order denying the disqualification of a judge has been held not to be a
    final appealable order. See In re Disqualification of Kimbler, 
    44 Ohio App. 3d 9
    (9th
    Dist.1988).
    2
    {¶12} In the present case, there is nothing in the record of this case which
    reflects that appellant has been convicted or sentenced in her criminal case. In fact,
    after the notice of appeal was filed, the case was bound over to the court of common
    pleas, which is where it remains pending. Since there is no sentence in which appellant
    can appeal at this time, we lack jurisdiction over this matter.
    {¶13} Accordingly, this appeal is hereby, sua sponte, dismissed for lack of
    jurisdiction.
    TIMOTHY P. CANNON, P.J.,
    COLLEEN MARY O’TOOLE, J.,
    concur.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2014-G-3202

Judges: Wright

Filed Date: 9/8/2014

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014