State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros ( 2019 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros, 2019-Ohio-626.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    LUCAS COUNTY
    State of Ohio, ex rel. André D. Rice                      Court of Appeals No. L-19-1015
    Relator
    v.
    Honorable Judge Dean P. Mandros                           DECISION AND JUDGMENT
    Respondent                                        Decided: February 20, 2019
    *****
    André D. Rice, pro se.
    *****
    SINGER, J.
    {¶ 1} Relator, André D. Rice, an inmate at the Trumbull Correctional Institution in
    Trumbull County, Ohio, has petitioned for a writ of procedendo, requesting this court to
    compel the trial court to make a ruling on his April 17, 2018 “post-conviction motion for
    allied offenses merger resentencing.”
    {¶ 2} “Procedendo is an order from a court of superior jurisdiction to one of
    inferior jurisdiction to proceed to judgment.” State ex rel. Draper v. State, 10th Dist.
    Franklin No. 07AP-357, 2007-Ohio-5581, ¶ 17, citing State ex rel. Sherrills v. Cuyahoga
    Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 
    72 Ohio St. 3d 461
    , 462, 
    650 N.E.2d 899
    (1995). “The writ
    does not in any case attempt to control the inferior court as to what that judgment might
    be.” 
    Id. “A writ
    of procedendo is appropriate when a court has either refused to render a
    judgment or has unnecessarily delayed proceeding to judgment.” 
    Id. {¶ 3}
    R.C. 2969.25 provides that, at the time of petitioning for a writ of
    procedendo, an inmate must “file with the court an affidavit that contains a description of
    each civil action or appeal of a civil action that the inmate has filed in the previous five
    years in any state or federal court.” See Draper at ¶ 2-4 (dismissing because of failure to
    comply with R.C. 2969.25).
    {¶ 4} Here, we find relator failed to submit an affidavit as to prior actions.
    {¶ 5} Accordingly, and based on the foregoing ground, we decline to issue the writ
    and the petition is not well-taken and is denied. Relator is ordered to pay the costs of this
    action. The clerk is directed to serve the parties with notice of this judgment and its date
    of entry on the journal pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B).
    Writ denied.
    2.
    State ex rel. Rice v. Mandros
    C.A. No. L-19-1015
    Mark L. Pietrykowski, J.                      _______________________________
    JUDGE
    Arlene Singer, J.
    _______________________________
    Thomas J. Osowik, J.                                      JUDGE
    CONCUR.
    _______________________________
    JUDGE
    This decision is subject to further editing by the Supreme Court of
    Ohio’s Reporter of Decisions. Parties interested in viewing the final reported
    version are advised to visit the Ohio Supreme Court’s web site at:
    http://www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/ROD/docs/.
    3.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: L-19-1015

Judges: Singer

Filed Date: 2/20/2019

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 2/21/2019