State v. Nixon ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Nixon, 
    2022-Ohio-4467
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    PORTAGE COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                   CASE NO. 2022-P-0067
    Plaintiff-Appellee,
    Criminal Appeal from the
    - vs -                                  Court of Common Pleas
    DAVID A. NIXON,
    Trial Court No. 2022 CR 00534
    Defendant-Appellant.
    MEMORANDUM
    OPINION
    Decided: December 12, 2022
    Judgment: Appeal dismissed
    Victor V. Vigluicci, Portage County Prosecutor, 241 South Chestnut Street, Ravenna,
    OH 44266 (For Plaintiff-Appellee).
    David A. Nixon, pro se, Portage County Justice Center, 8240 Infirmary Road, Ravenna,
    OH 44266 (Defendant-Appellant).
    JOHN J. EKLUND, P.J.
    {¶1}     On November 8, 2022, appellant, David A. Nixon, pro se, filed a notice of
    appeal from an October 24, 2022 judgment entry of the Portage County Court of Common
    Pleas which denied his motion to dismiss the amended indictment.
    {¶2}     R.C. 2505.02 defines the types of orders that constitute a final appealable
    order:
    {¶3}     “(1) An order that affects a substantial right in an action that in effect
    determines the action and prevents a judgment;
    {¶4}   “(2) An order that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding or
    upon a summary application in an action after judgment;
    {¶5}   “(3) An order that vacates or sets aside a judgment or grants a new trial;
    {¶6}   “(4) An order that grants or denies a provisional remedy and to which both
    of the following apply:
    {¶7}   “(a) The order in effect determines the action with respect to the provisional
    remedy and prevents a judgment in the action in favor of the appealing party with respect
    to the provisional remedy.
    {¶8}   “(b) The appealing party would not be afforded a meaningful or effective
    remedy by an appeal following final judgment as to all proceedings, issues, claims, and
    parties in the action.
    {¶9}   * * *.”
    {¶10} In regard to criminal cases, pursuant to R.C. 2953.02, a court of appeals
    only possesses jurisdiction to hear an appeal if it is from a “judgment or final order.”
    Furthermore, the Supreme Court of Ohio has stated that “in a criminal case there must
    be a sentence which constitutes a judgment or a final order which amounts ‘to a
    disposition of the cause’ before there is a basis for appeal.” State v. Chamberlain, 
    177 Ohio St. 104
    , 106-107(1964).
    {¶11} The appealed judgment does not conform to any of the criteria in R.C.
    2505.02 for being a final appealable order. The docket reflects that trial court granted
    judgment on the verdict on October 28, 2022. The appeal was filed November 8, 2022.
    On November 16, 2022, the trial court scheduled the sentencing hearing for November
    2
    Case No. 2022-P-0067
    18, 2022. This appeal has been prematurely filed. Appellant can appeal once he is
    sentenced.
    {¶12} Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    MARY JANE TRAPP, J.,
    MATT LYNCH, J.,
    concur.
    3
    Case No. 2022-P-0067
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2022-P-0067

Judges: Eklund

Filed Date: 12/12/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 12/12/2022