State v. Gibson ( 2018 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Gibson, 2018-Ohio-4482.]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    WARREN COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                     :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,                        :     CASE NO. CA2018-01-008
    :           DECISION
    - vs -                                                      11/5/2018
    :
    MASAI GIBSON,                                      :
    Defendant-Appellant.                       :
    CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM WARREN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. 17 CR 033326
    David P. Fornshell, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, Kirsten A. Brandt, 520 Justice
    Drive, Lebanon, Ohio 45036, for plaintiff-appellee
    Craig A. Newburger, 477 Forest Edge Drive, South Lebanon, Ohio 45065, for defendant-
    appellant
    Per Curiam.
    {¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the transcript of
    the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the
    Warren County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief and amended brief filed by
    appellant's counsel.
    {¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, Masai Gibson, has filed a brief and amended brief with
    Warren CA2018-01-008
    this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 
    87 S. Ct. 1396
    (1967), which (1)
    indicate that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any
    errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of
    error may be predicated; (2) list four potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal,"
    Anders at 
    744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400
    ; (3) request that this court review the record independently to
    determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of
    appellant's constitutional rights; (4) request permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant
    on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certify that a copy of both the brief
    and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.
    {¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that
    it is wholly frivolous.
    S. POWELL, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
    -2-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2018-01-008

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 11/5/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/5/2018