Wadley v. Roth , 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 568 ( 1923 )

PER CURIAM.

Epitomized Opinion

The plaintiff, Roth, recovered a judgment against Wadley in the Court of Common Pleas and the defendant prosecuted error, claiming that the judgment is manifestly against the weight of evidence. The Court of Appeals held:

To reverse the judgment upon that ground, the law requires that all the members of the Appellate Court shall concur in a finding to that effect. This court being unanimously of the opinion that the judgment was not so against the weight of evidence. It is therefore affirmed.