Sollinger v. State ( 1933 )

BY THE COURT

The plaintiff in error was convicted of pocket picking before a judge, a jury being ■waived. No question is raised but that of the weight of the evidence and that question in view of the attendant circumstances boils down' to whether or not the accused was on the street car when the offense was committed. There was direct evidénce that he was there and that he stole the money. The record does not warrant a reversal.

Judgment affirmed.

MAUCK, BLOSSER and MIDDLETON, JJ, concur.