United Aircraft Products, Inc. v. Cruzan ( 1945 )

OPINION

BY THE COURT:

Submitted on application for rehearing.

No sufficient rea_son is set forth to require a rehearing on this appeal. In our original opinion although we confined our discussion to the principal and determinative question before us, we also said, on page seven, that “no error assigned is well made”. The journal entry may be prepared to conform to our finding that no error assigned is established.

HORNBECK, P. J., GEIGER, J„ and NICHOLS, J., concur.