Greenville v. Holzapfel , 85 Ohio App. 3d 383 ( 1993 )

In this case, there apparently is testimony in the record that after its removal for repairs the intoxilyzer was restored not only to the exact same location, but also to exactly the same orientation about its vertical axis of rotation. I would simply note that this testimony is sufficient to distinguish this case from Fairborn v. Ellis (Oct. 26, 1992), Greene App. No. 92-CA-19, unreported, 1992 WL 311345, in which we affirmed the suppression of a breath-alcohol test.