State Ex Rel. Cottrill v. Meigs Cty. , 86 Ohio App. 3d 596 ( 1993 )

I concur in the judgment of the principal opinion on the grounds that the Supreme Court has directed that "the statecan and should augment county appropriations under R.C.5123.351(G), (H), and (I)." (Emphasis added.) Jackson Cty. Bd.of Mental Retardation Dev. Disabilities v. Bd. of Commrs. ofJackson Cty. (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 63, 65, 551 N.E.2d 133, 135.