State v. Byrd , 2022 Ohio 1168 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Byrd, 
    2022-Ohio-1168
    .]
    COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    STATE OF OHIO,                                   :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,             :
    No. 110451
    v.                              :
    MARQUS BYRD,                                     :
    Defendant-Appellant.            :
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
    RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: April 7, 2022
    Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
    Case Nos. CR-20-647832-A and CR-20-652759-A
    Appearances:
    Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
    Attorney, and Chadwick Cleveland, Assistant Prosecuting
    Attorney, for appellee.
    Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
    John T. Martin, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    JAMES A. BROGAN, J.:
    Defendant-appellant Marqus Byrd appeals his sentence and assigns the
    following error:
    I. As amended by the Reagan Tokes Act, the Revised Code’s sentences
    for first and second degree qualifying felonies violates the constitutions
    of the United States and the state of Ohio; the trial court plainly erred
    in imposing a Reagan Tokes indefinite sentence.
    After reviewing the record and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s
    judgment.
    Byrd pleaded guilty in two separate cases to attempted aggravated
    burglary (Count 1), endangering children (Count 4), having weapons while under
    disability (Count 5), criminal damaging (Count 7) in Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-20-
    652759-A and unlawful sexual conduct with a minor (Count 1), carrying concealed
    weapons (Count 2), and criminal child enticement (Count 3) in Cuyahoga C.P. No.
    CR-20-647382-A. Over objection, the trial court sentenced Byrd to an indefinite
    prison term of a minimum of three years and a maximum of four and one-half years
    in prison on the attempted aggravated burglary charge, pursuant to the Reagan
    Tokes Law. The trial court sentenced Byrd to six months on the endangering
    children charge, 24 months on the weapons while under disability charge, 60 days
    in jail on the criminal damaging charge, 48 months in prison on the unlawful sexual
    conduct with a minor charge, 12 months in prison on the carrying concealed weapon
    charge, and 6 months in jail on the child enticement charge. The court’s journal
    entry states, in relevant part, that “Counts are to run concurrently to each other for
    a total of 3 years to 4.5 years in prison. Sentence to run concurrently with Case No.
    CR 647832.”
    Byrd now brings this appeal challenging the constitutionality of his
    indefinite sentence under the Reagan Tokes Law.1
    In his sole assignment of error, Byrd argues his indefinite sentence
    under the Reagan Tokes Law is unconstitutional. He contends the Reagan Tokes
    Law violates his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, the separation-of-powers
    doctrine, and due process of law.
    In accordance with this court’s en banc decision in State v. Delvallie,
    8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 
    2022-Ohio-470
    , the constitutional challenges
    presented in this appeal are overruled.
    Therefore, the sole assignment of error is overruled.
    Judgment affirmed.
    It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
    The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
    It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
    common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution. Case remanded to the
    trial court for execution of sentence.
    1  Neither party has raised any issues as to the imposed sentence; therefore, any
    determination as to the validity of the sentence is beyond the scope of this direct appeal.
    State v. Harper, 
    160 Ohio St.3d 480
    , 
    2020-Ohio-2913
    , 
    159 N.E.3d 248
    , ¶ 26; State v.
    Henderson, 
    161 Ohio St.3d 285
    , 
    2020-Ohio-4784
    , 
    162 N.E.3d 776
    , ¶ 27. See also State v.
    Davis, 
    119 Ohio St.3d 422
    , 
    2008-Ohio-4608
    , 
    894 N.E.2d 1221
    ; State v. Murnahan, 
    63 Ohio St.3d 60
    , 66, 
    584 N.E.2d 1204
     (1992); App.R. 26(B).
    A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27
    of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    JAMES A. BROGAN, JUDGE*
    MARY J. BOYLE, P.J., and
    FRANK DANIEL CELEBREZZE, III, J., CONCUR
    *(Sitting by assignment: James A. Brogan, J., retired, of the Second District Court
    of Appeals.)
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 110451

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 1168

Judges: Brogan

Filed Date: 4/7/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/3/2022