State v. Walker , 2022 Ohio 1404 ( 2022 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Walker, 
    2022-Ohio-1404
    .]
    COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO
    EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
    STATE OF OHIO,                                     :
    Plaintiff-Appellee,               :
    No. 110839
    v.                                :
    KEVIN WALKER, JR.,                                 :
    Defendant-Appellant.              :
    JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
    JUDGMENT: AFFIRMED
    RELEASED AND JOURNALIZED: April 28, 2022
    Criminal Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas
    Case No. CR-19-643439-A
    Appearances:
    Michael C. O’Malley, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting
    Attorney, and Andrew F. Rogalski, Assistant Prosecuting
    Attorney, for appellee.
    Cullen Sweeney, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and
    Aaron T. Baker, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.
    CORNELIUS J. O’SULLIVAN, JR., J.:
    In 2021, Kevin Walker, Jr., pled guilty to 23 counts of a 131-count
    indictment stemming from a violent burglary and carjacking spree. The trial court
    sentenced Walker on Count 1, engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, a felony of
    the second degree, to an indefinite sentence of two to three years in prison under the
    Reagan Tokes Law, enacted through S.B. 201 and as defined under R.C. 2901.011.
    For the other 22 counts, the trial court sentenced appellant to definite sentences
    ranging from 180 days to two years in prison. The trial court ordered the sentences
    on Count 1, Count 47,1 Count 58,2 and Count 1283 to run consecutive to all other
    counts for an aggregate sentence of a minimum of 10 years in prison to a maximum
    of 11 years in prison.    On appeal, Walker challenges only his indefinite sentence
    (Count 1) under the Reagan Tokes Law.4 He argues that the Reagan Tokes Law is
    unconstitutional because it violates the right to trial by jury, the separation-of-
    powers doctrine, and the right to due process.5
    The arguments presented in this appeal do not present novel issues or
    new theories challenging the constitutional validity of any aspect of the Reagan
    Tokes Law left unaddressed by this court’s en banc decision in State v. Delvallie,
    1 36 months, failure to comply with order or signal of police officer, R.C.
    2921.331(B).
    2   24 months, having weapons while under disability, R.C. 2923.13(A)(2).
    3 36 months, failure to comply with order or signal of police officer, R.C.
    2921.331(B).
    8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 
    2022-Ohio-470
    . Accordingly, pursuant to Delvallie,
    we overrule Walker’s assignment of error.
    Judgment affirmed.
    It is ordered that appellee recover from appellant costs herein taxed.
    The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.
    It is ordered that a special mandate issue out of this court directing the
    common pleas court to carry this judgment into execution.               The defendant’s
    conviction having been affirmed, any bail pending is terminated. Case remanded to
    the trial court for execution of sentence.
    4  Neither party has raised any issues as to the imposed sentence; therefore, any
    determination as to the validity of the sentence is beyond the scope of this direct appeal.
    State v. Harper, 
    160 Ohio St.3d 480
    , 
    2020-Ohio-2913
    , 
    159 N.E.3d 248
    , ¶ 26; State v.
    Henderson, 
    161 Ohio St.3d 285
    , 
    2020-Ohio-4784
    , 
    162 N.E.3d 776
    , ¶ 27.
    5 The Ohio Supreme Court recently determined that a defendant’s challenge to the
    Reagan Tokes Law is ripe for review on the defendant’s direct appeal of his or her
    conviction and prison sentence. State v. Maddox, Slip Opinion No. 2022-1266, 2022-
    Ohio-764, ¶ 21.
    A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27
    of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
    CORNELIUS J. O’SULLIVAN, JR., JUDGE
    LISA B. FORBES, P.J., and
    EMANUELLA D. GROVES, J., CONCUR
    N.B. Judge Lisa B. Forbes is constrained to apply Delvallie. For a full explanation,
    see State v. Delvallie, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 109315, 
    2022-Ohio-470
     (Forbes, J.,
    dissenting).
    Judge Emanuella D. Groves concurred with the opinions of Judge Lisa B. Forbes
    (dissenting) and Judge Anita Laster Mays (concurring in part and dissenting in part)
    in Delvallie and would have found the Reagan Tokes Law unconstitutional.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 110839

Citation Numbers: 2022 Ohio 1404

Judges: O'Sullivan

Filed Date: 4/28/2022

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/28/2022