State v. Ishimwe ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Ishimwe, 
    2024-Ohio-4526
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    BUTLER COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                     :
    Appellee,                                   :         CASE NO. CA2024-03-043
    :             DECISION
    - vs -                                                        9/16/2024
    :
    CEDRIC ISHIMWE,                                    :
    Appellant.                                  :
    CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. CR2023-07-1050
    Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and John Heinkel, Assistant
    Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    Repper-Pagan Law, Ltd., and Christopher Pagan, for appellant.
    Per Curiam.
    {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
    appellant, Cedric Ishimwe, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of
    proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon
    the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
    {¶2}     Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from
    Butler CA2024-03-043
    the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights
    of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential
    errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744; (3) requests that this court
    review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from
    prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests
    permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly
    frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been
    served upon appellant.
    {¶3}    Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason
    that it is wholly frivolous.
    BYRNE, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
    -2-
    [Cite as State v. Ishimwe, 
    2024-Ohio-4526
    .]
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2024-03-043

Judges: Per Curiam

Filed Date: 9/16/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2024