-
While I agree with the majority's conclusion that res judicata mandates that a plaintiff must present every ground for relief in the first cause of action or be barred from later bringing such a claim, I must respectfully dissent because procedurally the trial court erred in granting judgment on the pleadings on a theory of res judicata. In analyzing a motion to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B) that was granted on the basis of res judicata, the Supreme Court of Ohio noted that a claim for res judicata could not be brought under Civ.R. 12(B), however it could be brought in a motion for summary judgment. See State, ex rel. Freeman v. Morris (1991),
62 Ohio St. 3d 107 ,109 . Similarly here, the trial court should have denied Appellee's motion for judgment on the pleadings. For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully dissent.
Document Info
Docket Number: C.A. No. 19779.
Judges: SLABY, Judge.
Filed Date: 12/27/2000
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 4/18/2021