State v. Spaulding , 2024 Ohio 5047 ( 2024 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as State v. Spaulding, 
    2024-Ohio-5047
    .]
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
    TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO
    BUTLER COUNTY
    STATE OF OHIO,                                       :
    Appellee,                                     :         CASE NO. CA2024-04-056
    :             DECISION
    - vs -                                                          10/21/2024
    :
    JASON CHRISTOPHER SPAULDING,                         :
    Appellant.                                    :
    APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
    Case No. CR2023-03-0321
    Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.
    Michele Temmel, for appellant.
    Per Curiam.
    {¶1}     This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by
    appellant, Jason Christopher Spaulding, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the
    transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common
    Pleas, and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel.
    {¶2}     Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.
    California, 
    386 U.S. 738
     (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from
    Butler CA2024-04-056
    the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights
    of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists one potential
    error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders, at 744; (3) requests that this court
    review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from
    prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests
    permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly
    frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been
    served upon appellant.
    {¶3}    Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having
    been received, we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to
    appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant
    requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason
    that it is wholly frivolous.
    BYRNE, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.
    -2-
    [Cite as State v. Spaulding, 
    2024-Ohio-5047
    .]
    

Document Info

Docket Number: CA2024-04-056

Citation Numbers: 2024 Ohio 5047

Filed Date: 10/21/2024

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/18/2024