Graham v. Like Milton State Park , 2011 Ohio 3535 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • [Cite as Graham v. Like Milton State Park, 
    2011-Ohio-3535
    .]
    Court of Claims of Ohio
    The Ohio Judicial Center
    65 South Front Street, Third Floor
    Columbus, OH 43215
    614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
    www.cco.state.oh.us
    STEPHEN GRAHAM
    Plaintiff
    v.
    LAKE MILTON STATE PARK
    Defendant
    Case No. 2010-11331-AD
    Clerk Miles C. Durfey
    MEMORANDUM DECISION
    FINDINGS OF FACT
    {¶ 1} On July 11, 2010, plaintiff, Stephen Graham , suffered personal injury and
    property damage when he drove his vehicle onto the premises of defendant, Lake
    Milton State Park, and an unattended gate swung into the path of plaintiff's car striking
    the hood, shattering the windshield, and striking plaintiff in the head. Plaintiff filed this
    complaint seeking to recover $1,969.93, the cost of automobile repairs, ambulance
    transport to the hospital, medical co-pays for follow-up care, and the replacement cost
    for a GPS navigation system that had been mounted on the windshield. Plaintiff has
    implied that defendant, as owner of the damage-causing gate, should bear liability for
    the damages incurred. Plaintiff submitted the filing fee with the complaint.
    {¶ 2} Defendant denied liability based on the fact that plaintiff was a recreational
    user of Lake Milton State Park at the time of the property damage occurrence.
    Defendant explained that Lake Milton State Park is open to the public free of charge
    and that plaintiff did not pay a fee to use the facilities.
    {¶ 3} Plaintiff filed a response wherein he contended that the recreational user
    statute did not apply to the facts of this matter in that the gate in question was left
    unsecured by a negligent act of defendant’s employee. Plaintiff cited the holding of Ryll
    v. Columbus Fireworks Display, Co. 
    95 Ohio St. 3d 467
    , 
    2002-Ohio-2584
    , ¶15 wherein
    the Supreme Court of Ohio found that inasmuch as the injury was caused by shrapnel
    propelled from exploding fireworks and that the fireworks were not part of the
    "premises" as defined in R.C. 1533.18(A), the immunity conferred by the statutory
    language did not apply.       In addition, plaintiff argued that the relevant statute cited by
    defendant was unconstitutional.1 Finally, plaintiff noted that his insurance company had
    reimbursed the cost of the ambulance such that his damage claim was reduced to
    $954.33.
    CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
    {¶ 4} Since this incident occurred at Lake Milton State Park, defendant qualifies
    as the owner of the "premises" under R.C. 1533.18, et seq.
    {¶ 5} "Premises" and "recreational user" are defined in R.C. 1533.18, as follows:
    {¶ 6} "(A) 'Premises' means all privately-owned lands, ways, and waters and
    any buildings and structures thereon, and all privately owned and state-owned lands,
    ways and waters leased to a private person, firm, or organization, including any
    buildings and structures thereon. "(B) 'Recreational user' means a person to whom
    permission has been granted, without the payment of a fee or consideration to the
    owner, lessee, or occupant of premises, other than a fee or consideration paid to the
    state or any agency of the state or a lease payment fee paid to the owner of privately
    owned lands, to enter upon the premises to hunt, fish, trap, camp, hike or swim, or to
    operate a snowmobile, all-purpose vehicle, or four-wheel drive motor vehicle, or to
    engage in other recreational pursuits."      R.C. 1533.181 states:
    {¶ 7} "(A) No owner, lessee, or occupant of premises:
    {¶ 8} "(1) Owes any duty to a recreational user to keep the premises safe for
    entry or use; "(2) Extends any assurance to a recreational user, through the act of
    giving permission, that the premises are safe for entry or use."
    {¶ 9} Pursuant to the enactment of R.C. 2743.02(A), the definition of premises
    in R.C. 1533.18(A) effectively encompassed state-owned lands. Moss v. Department of
    Natural Resources (1980), 
    62 Ohio St. 2d 138
    , 16 O.O. 3d 161, 
    404 N.E.2d 742
    . R.C.
    1
    Plaintiff’s constitutional challenge is not well-taken. See McCord v. Division of Parks and
    Recreation (1978), 
    54 Ohio St. 2d 72
    , 8 O.O. 3d 77, 
    375 N.E. 2d 50
    .
    1533.181(A)(1), which provides, inter alia, that an owner of premises owes no duty to a
    recreational user to keep the premises safe for entry or use, applies to the state.
    Fetherolf v. State (1982), 
    7 Ohio App. 3d 110
    , 7 OBR 142, 
    454 N.E.2d 564
    . Plaintiff is
    clearly a recreational user, having paid no fee to enter the premises. Owing no duty to
    plaintiff, defendant clearly has no liability under a negligence theory. Loudermilk v.
    Buckeye Lake State Park, Ct. of Cl. No. 2003-10406-AD, 
    2004-Ohio-1344
    .
    {¶ 10} To the extent that plaintiff characterized the occurrence as having been
    caused “by the negligence of a park employee, not by the premises,” the court finds that
    defendant still has immunity from liability under the recreational user statute. See
    Mitchell v. City of Blue Ash, 
    181 Ohio App. 3d 804
    , 
    2009-Ohio-1887
    , ¶10 (holding that
    “the basis of the Ryll decision was not that the negligence of a city employee or other
    person had contributed to the injury, but rather that the injury had not arisen from part of
    the premises “ and thus concluding that “in cases decided by the Ohio Court of Claims
    since the Ryll decision, that court has held the state government immune under the
    recreational-user statute even where the plaintiff had alleged negligence on the part of
    public employees.”) See also Gudliauskas v. Lakefront State Park, Ct. of Cl. No. 2004-
    08464, 
    2005-Ohio-5598
     (allegedly negligent driving on part of park ranger causing injury
    to skater.)
    Court of Claims of Ohio
    The Ohio Judicial Center
    65 South Front Street, Third Floor
    Columbus, OH 43215
    614.387.9800 or 1.800.824.8263
    www.cco.state.oh.us
    STEPHEN GRAHAM
    Plaintiff
    v.
    LAKE MILTON STATE PARK
    Defendant
    Case No. 2010-11331-AD
    Clerk Miles C. Durfey
    ENTRY OF ADMINISTRATIVE DETERMINATION
    Having considered all the evidence in the claim file and, for the reasons set forth
    in the memorandum decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is rendered in favor
    of defendant. Court costs are assessed against plaintiff.
    ________________________________
    MILES C. DURFEY
    Clerk
    Entry cc:
    Stephen Graham                                    Charles G. Rowan
    4448 Swan Lake Drive                              Department of Natural Resources
    Copley, Ohio 44321                                2045 Morse Road, D-3
    Columbus, Ohio 43229-6693
    SJM/laa
    3/21
    Filed 4/5/11
    Sent to S.C. reporter 7/8/11
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-11331-AD

Citation Numbers: 2011 Ohio 3535

Judges: Durfey

Filed Date: 4/5/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014