Haines v. Greenfield Exempted Village Schools Board of Education ( 2022 )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI Olivia Haines, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:21cv688 v. Judge Michael R. Barrett Greenfield Exempted Village Schools, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the School Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (Doc. 32). Plaintiffs have since filed (with leave of Court)1 an Amended Complaint. (Doc. 44). In turn, the School Defendants have answered that pleading (Doc. 45) and filed a second Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 46). The School Defendants’ second Rule 12(c) Motion (Doc. 46)—filed in the wake of the Amended Complaint (Doc. 44)—renders moot their first Motion (Doc. 32). See Greater Cincinnati Coal. for the Homeless v. City of Cincinnati, No. C-1-08-603, 2009 WL 3029661, at *3 (S.D. Ohio Sept. 16, 2009) (citing Yates v. Applied Performance Techs., Inc., 205 F.R.D. 497, 499 (S.D. Ohio 2002)). Accordingly, the School Defendants’ (first) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 32) is hereby DENIED as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court 1 See (07/19/2022 Minute Entry).