Geter, Guardian v. Boyd , 34 Okla. 743 ( 1912 )

It is stipulated between the plaintiff in error and defendant in error in this case that this is substantially the same as the case of Daniel Geter, Guardian of Dollie Corbray, v.Charles E. Ulrich, ante, 127 P. 387, which has just been decided; and for the reasons stated in that opinion the judgment of the district court should be affirmed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.