-
The judgment in this case is a final judgment, because it dismisses the action, and there is *Page 271 no motion for a new trial; nor is there any certificate of the clerk which will enable us to review the record as a transcript. There is therefore nothing before this court.Stanard v. Sampson,
23 Okla. 13 ,99 P. 796 ; Boyd v. Bryan,11 Okla. 56 ,65 P. 940 ; Bradford v. Brennan,15 Okla. 47 ,78 P. 387 ; Ahren-Ott Mfg. Co. v. Condon,23 Okla. 365 ,100 P. 556 .As there is no certificate of the clerk authenticating this as a transcript, this court is without jurisdiction to consider any errors which might appear on the face of the record.
We therefore recommend that the appeal be dismissed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
Document Info
Docket Number: 5262
Citation Numbers: 153 P. 289, 54 Okla. 269, 1915 OK 941, 1915 Okla. LEXIS 1306
Judges: Devereux
Filed Date: 11/16/1915
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/19/2024