Harjo v. Collins ( 1931 )

In this case substantially the same state of facts is pleaded as in En-le-te-ke et al. v. W. A. Beasley et al., No. 19939. this day decided, 148 Okla. 255, 298 P. 611, and with which this case, together with others, was consolidated.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

LESTER., C. J., and HEFNER, CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and KOPNEGAY, JJ., concur. CLARK, V. C. J., not participating.