-
Opinion by
Mr. Commissioner King. This is an action by the Douglas County Bank against defendant to recover $300, with interest, alleged to be due plaintiff on a promissory note, in which the points involved are, in effect, the same as in Sutherlin v. Bloomer (decided on this date), 50 Or. 398 (93 Pac. 135), except as to the third error there urged.
The judgment of the trial court must accordingly be affirmed.
Affirmed.
Document Info
Judges: King
Filed Date: 12/17/1907
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 11/13/2024