State v. David ( 1976 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM.

    Counsel have stipulated:

    "It appearing to counsel for appellant and respondent herein that defendant-appellant’s sentence as a dangerous offender is erroneous, in that the judgment order herein imposes an additional sentence for being a dangerous offender, instead of enhancing the sentence for the underlying offense:
    "IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between counsel for appellant and respondent that the judgment herein should be vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing.”

    Reversed and remanded.

Document Info

Docket Number: No. C 75-09-2796 Cr, CA 5628

Judges: Fort, Langtry, Schwab

Filed Date: 8/2/1976

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024