Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Gatens , 94 Or. App. 451 ( 1988 )

PER CURIAM

The parties submitted their briefs in this judicial review on the assumption that our review is de novo. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law. ORS 656.298(6); Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200, 752 P2d 312 (1988). Substantial evidence supports the Board’s order.

Affirmed.