Bishop v. Force ( 1991 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM

    In her second amended complaint, plaintiff sued defendant for malpractice and fraud. The trial court dismissed both claims on defendant’s ORCP 21A(8) motion. Defendant concedes that the motion was not directed at the fraud claim and that dismissing that claim was error.

    Reversed and remanded on fraud claim; otherwise affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: 90 03 01511; CA A68113

Judges: Edmonds, Riggs, Warren

Filed Date: 11/13/1991

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024