State v. Jenkins , 200 Or. App. 381 ( 2005 )

PER CURIAM

Appellant challenges an order of involuntary commitment, arguing that the evidence submitted at the hearing did not establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that, because of a mental disorder, he is a danger to himself or to others. The state concedes that the record does not contain evidence sufficient to support the order of involuntary commitment. We accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.