State v. Williams ( 2007 )


Menu:
  • PER CURIAM

    Defendant appeals his convictions for a variety of sex offenses, raising four assignments of error. We reject defendant’s first, third, and fourth assignments of error without discussion. Further, we reject defendant’s second assignment of error, pertaining to the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to require the state to make pretrial elections regarding the specific acts alleged in the indictment, based on the analysis set forth in State v. Magana, 212 Or App 553, 159 P3d 1163 (2007).

    Affirmed.

Document Info

Docket Number: C031181CR; A125992

Judges: Deits, Haselton, Rosenblum, Tempore

Filed Date: 9/5/2007

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/13/2024